<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>identityserver Issue Tracker Rss Feed</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/list/basic</link><description>identityserver Issue Tracker Rss Description</description><item><title>Created Issue: Connecting wsfederation issuer from visual studio IIS express [9831]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/9831</link><description>I have hosted Identity Server in my local IIS as a website. I am trying to connect to this Identity Server using my MVC application that is running through visual studio IIS express. I am getting an Access Denied error. In my system I login as domain user who is not in local administrator group. Please suggest me.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;sathya&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>tsathiyas</author><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:42:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Connecting wsfederation issuer from visual studio IIS express [9831] 20130109024241P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: https://localhost/sts/issue/wstrust/mex doesn't return anything... [8855]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/8855</link><description>&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;Hi &amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;&amp;#38;nbsp&amp;#59;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;Does someone know why mex endpoint doesn&amp;#38;&amp;#35;39&amp;#59;t return anything, &amp;#63; I downloaded latest version as well but it doesn&amp;#38;&amp;#35;39&amp;#59;t return any information,&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;it returns HTTP&amp;#47;1.1 400 Bad Request, &amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;I tried ACS mex endpoint&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;https&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;xxxxx.accesscontrol.appfabriclabs.com&amp;#47;v2&amp;#47;wstrust&amp;#47;mex&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;&amp;#38;nbsp&amp;#59;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;and it does return WSDL, also &amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;https&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;localhost&amp;#47;sts&amp;#47;issue&amp;#47;wstrust&amp;#63;wsdl return WSDL &amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;&amp;#38;nbsp&amp;#59;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;why mex endpoint returns Bad request&amp;#63; is it a bug or do I have to any configuration.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;&amp;#38;nbsp&amp;#59;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;I have been using STS for a while and for .NET clients this wasn&amp;#38;&amp;#35;39&amp;#59;t be a problem. But recently I tried connecting WCF protected with STS and i&amp;#38;&amp;#35;39&amp;#59;m getting following error, so then i just checked the mex endpoint and it returns Bad Request, can someone help me on this.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;&amp;#38;nbsp&amp;#59;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;Oct 26, 2011 3&amp;#58;54&amp;#58;40 PM com.sun.xml.wss.jaxws.impl.SecurityClientTube invokeTrustPlugin&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;SEVERE&amp;#58; WSSTUBE0035&amp;#58; Recieved Exception during IssuedToken Creation.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;com.sun.xml.ws.api.security.trust.WSTrustException&amp;#58; WST0017&amp;#58;Could not obtain STS metadata. MEX call to STS https&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;mydomain.com&amp;#47;issue&amp;#47;wstrust&amp;#47;mex failed.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;&amp;#9;at com.sun.xml.ws.security.trust.impl.TrustPluginImpl.doMexRequest&amp;#40;TrustPluginImpl.java&amp;#58;682&amp;#41;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;&amp;#38;nbsp&amp;#59;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;at com.sun.xml.ws.security.trust.impl.TrustPluginImpl.invokeRST&amp;#40;TrustPluginImpl.java&amp;#58;5&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;&amp;#38;nbsp&amp;#59;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;&amp;#38;nbsp&amp;#59;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;Thanks&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: DominickBaier ** &lt;p&gt;Is this IdentityServer v1 or v2 ? - for v2 please use &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;https://github.com/thinktecture/Thinktecture.IdentityServer.v2/issues?state=open&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>DominickBaier</author><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 05:56:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: https://localhost/sts/issue/wstrust/mex doesn't return anything... [8855] 20130108055653A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: https://localhost/sts/issue/wstrust/mex doesn't return anything... [8855]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/8855</link><description>&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;Hi &amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;&amp;#38;nbsp&amp;#59;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;Does someone know why mex endpoint doesn&amp;#38;&amp;#35;39&amp;#59;t return anything, &amp;#63; I downloaded latest version as well but it doesn&amp;#38;&amp;#35;39&amp;#59;t return any information,&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;it returns HTTP&amp;#47;1.1 400 Bad Request, &amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;I tried ACS mex endpoint&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;https&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;xxxxx.accesscontrol.appfabriclabs.com&amp;#47;v2&amp;#47;wstrust&amp;#47;mex&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;&amp;#38;nbsp&amp;#59;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;and it does return WSDL, also &amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;https&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;localhost&amp;#47;sts&amp;#47;issue&amp;#47;wstrust&amp;#63;wsdl return WSDL &amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;&amp;#38;nbsp&amp;#59;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;why mex endpoint returns Bad request&amp;#63; is it a bug or do I have to any configuration.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;&amp;#38;nbsp&amp;#59;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;I have been using STS for a while and for .NET clients this wasn&amp;#38;&amp;#35;39&amp;#59;t be a problem. But recently I tried connecting WCF protected with STS and i&amp;#38;&amp;#35;39&amp;#59;m getting following error, so then i just checked the mex endpoint and it returns Bad Request, can someone help me on this.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;&amp;#38;nbsp&amp;#59;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;Oct 26, 2011 3&amp;#58;54&amp;#58;40 PM com.sun.xml.wss.jaxws.impl.SecurityClientTube invokeTrustPlugin&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;SEVERE&amp;#58; WSSTUBE0035&amp;#58; Recieved Exception during IssuedToken Creation.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;com.sun.xml.ws.api.security.trust.WSTrustException&amp;#58; WST0017&amp;#58;Could not obtain STS metadata. MEX call to STS https&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;mydomain.com&amp;#47;issue&amp;#47;wstrust&amp;#47;mex failed.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;&amp;#9;at com.sun.xml.ws.security.trust.impl.TrustPluginImpl.doMexRequest&amp;#40;TrustPluginImpl.java&amp;#58;682&amp;#41;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;&amp;#38;nbsp&amp;#59;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;at com.sun.xml.ws.security.trust.impl.TrustPluginImpl.invokeRST&amp;#40;TrustPluginImpl.java&amp;#58;5&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;&amp;#38;nbsp&amp;#59;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;&amp;#38;nbsp&amp;#59;&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#60;p&amp;#62;Thanks&amp;#60;&amp;#47;p&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: mkessel ** &lt;p&gt;Have you found a solution to this error? I am currently experiencing the same issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>mkessel</author><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:47:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: https://localhost/sts/issue/wstrust/mex doesn't return anything... [8855] 20130107124737P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: User which belongs to more than one role crashes the SimpleWebTokenHandler.CreateUnsignedToken method [9644]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/9644</link><description>When a user has more than one role, the SimpleWebTokenHandler serialization crashes &amp;#40;because it is dictionary based&amp;#41;.  When it tries to add the second role claim to the dictionary it complaims that the key is already in the dictionary.&lt;br /&gt;Is it a constraint for SWT that claims can only occur once or is this a small oversight &amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: wvdd007 ** &lt;p&gt;I know it&amp;#39;s the wrong place.  Unfortunately both the SimpleWebTokenHandler and JsonWebTokenHandler are in the ThinkTecture.IdentityModel assembly, which is not accessible &amp;#40;in source code&amp;#41; from this project.  I therefore has to resort to the poor mans solution with an ugly if statement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>wvdd007</author><pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 09:27:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: User which belongs to more than one role crashes the SimpleWebTokenHandler.CreateUnsignedToken method [9644] 20121001092726A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: User which belongs to more than one role crashes the SimpleWebTokenHandler.CreateUnsignedToken method [9644]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/9644</link><description>When a user has more than one role, the SimpleWebTokenHandler serialization crashes &amp;#40;because it is dictionary based&amp;#41;.  When it tries to add the second role claim to the dictionary it complaims that the key is already in the dictionary.&lt;br /&gt;Is it a constraint for SWT that claims can only occur once or is this a small oversight &amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: DominickBaier ** &lt;p&gt;Hi, &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;where did you fix this&amp;#63; in the token service itself. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#39;s the wrong place. The claims handling needs to be done in the SimpleWebTokenHandler. Have a look at the latest JsonWebTokenHandler...&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>DominickBaier</author><pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 07:09:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: User which belongs to more than one role crashes the SimpleWebTokenHandler.CreateUnsignedToken method [9644] 20121001070916A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: User which belongs to more than one role crashes the SimpleWebTokenHandler.CreateUnsignedToken method [9644]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/9644</link><description>When a user has more than one role, the SimpleWebTokenHandler serialization crashes &amp;#40;because it is dictionary based&amp;#41;.  When it tries to add the second role claim to the dictionary it complaims that the key is already in the dictionary.&lt;br /&gt;Is it a constraint for SWT that claims can only occur once or is this a small oversight &amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: wvdd007 ** &lt;p&gt;Hello, here is a quickfix the solves the problem for multi-valued claims.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>wvdd007</author><pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 16:24:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: User which belongs to more than one role crashes the SimpleWebTokenHandler.CreateUnsignedToken method [9644] 20120930042448P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: User which belongs to more than one role crashes the SimpleWebTokenHandler.CreateUnsignedToken method [9644]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/9644</link><description>When a user has more than one role, the SimpleWebTokenHandler serialization crashes &amp;#40;because it is dictionary based&amp;#41;.  When it tries to add the second role claim to the dictionary it complaims that the key is already in the dictionary.&lt;br /&gt;Is it a constraint for SWT that claims can only occur once or is this a small oversight &amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: wvdd007 ** &lt;p&gt;Ok, those work.  On SourceForge however, the &amp;#34;source code&amp;#34; tab has &amp;#34;connection instructions&amp;#34; that point to  https&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;identityserver.svn.codeplex.com&amp;#47;svn.  Those were empty.&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;ll have a look at the fixes.  I&amp;#39;ll post you an svn patch file if and when I&amp;#39;m done.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>wvdd007</author><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:51:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: User which belongs to more than one role crashes the SimpleWebTokenHandler.CreateUnsignedToken method [9644] 20120924115118A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: User which belongs to more than one role crashes the SimpleWebTokenHandler.CreateUnsignedToken method [9644]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/9644</link><description>When a user has more than one role, the SimpleWebTokenHandler serialization crashes &amp;#40;because it is dictionary based&amp;#41;.  When it tries to add the second role claim to the dictionary it complaims that the key is already in the dictionary.&lt;br /&gt;Is it a constraint for SWT that claims can only occur once or is this a small oversight &amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: DominickBaier ** &lt;p&gt;Which exact version of identity server are you using..&amp;#63;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The most recent source code can be found either at&amp;#58;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;https&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;github.com&amp;#47;thinktecture&amp;#47;Thinktecture.IdentityServer.45&lt;br /&gt;or&lt;br /&gt;https&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;github.com&amp;#47;thinktecture&amp;#47;Thinktecture.IdentityServer&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;all my new development goes into the 4.5 version.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>DominickBaier</author><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 07:30:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: User which belongs to more than one role crashes the SimpleWebTokenHandler.CreateUnsignedToken method [9644] 20120924073002A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: User which belongs to more than one role crashes the SimpleWebTokenHandler.CreateUnsignedToken method [9644]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/9644</link><description>When a user has more than one role, the SimpleWebTokenHandler serialization crashes &amp;#40;because it is dictionary based&amp;#41;.  When it tries to add the second role claim to the dictionary it complaims that the key is already in the dictionary.&lt;br /&gt;Is it a constraint for SWT that claims can only occur once or is this a small oversight &amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: wvdd007 ** &lt;p&gt;Sure, I want to fix this.  The problem is in in both SWT and JWT.  I only don&amp;#39;t know how I can fix it.  If I checkout from SVN, the instructions on this site just give me an empty directory.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>wvdd007</author><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 15:43:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: User which belongs to more than one role crashes the SimpleWebTokenHandler.CreateUnsignedToken method [9644] 20120923034311P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: User which belongs to more than one role crashes the SimpleWebTokenHandler.CreateUnsignedToken method [9644]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/9644</link><description>When a user has more than one role, the SimpleWebTokenHandler serialization crashes &amp;#40;because it is dictionary based&amp;#41;.  When it tries to add the second role claim to the dictionary it complaims that the key is already in the dictionary.&lt;br /&gt;Is it a constraint for SWT that claims can only occur once or is this a small oversight &amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: DominickBaier ** &lt;p&gt;Well both i guess - &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;first - in SWT only one claim per type is allowed - you need to separate the values with a &amp;#34;,&amp;#39;.&lt;br /&gt;..but this should be handled of course by the plumbing to give the end-user the familiar List&amp;#60;Claim&amp;#62; programming interface.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So i guess it is a bug. I am rarely using SWT.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do you want to fix it&amp;#63;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>DominickBaier</author><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 13:33:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: User which belongs to more than one role crashes the SimpleWebTokenHandler.CreateUnsignedToken method [9644] 20120923013339P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: User which belongs to more than one role crashes the SimpleWebTokenHandler.CreateUnsignedToken method [9644]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/9644</link><description>When a user has more than one role, the SimpleWebTokenHandler serialization crashes &amp;#40;because it is dictionary based&amp;#41;.  When it tries to add the second role claim to the dictionary it complaims that the key is already in the dictionary.&lt;br /&gt;Is it a constraint for SWT that claims can only occur once or is this a small oversight &amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>wvdd007</author><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:40:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: User which belongs to more than one role crashes the SimpleWebTokenHandler.CreateUnsignedToken method [9644] 20120919124017P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Trying to specify a certificate overflows the string buffer [9256]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/9256</link><description>I have IdentityServer setup and was specifying a new relying party in the admin pages but after choosing a certificate and clicking submit I get an error on screen&amp;#58; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#8226;An error occurred while updating the entries. See the inner exception for details.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So then I attach to process and attempt to track down the error and the text version of my certificate &amp;#40;beginning with MII&amp;#42;&amp;#41; is 2120 characters when it is expecting 2048. Here is the messge and stack trace&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An error occurred while updating the entries. See the inner exception for details.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   at System.Data.Entity.Internal.InternalContext.SaveChanges&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;   at Thinktecture.IdentityServer.Repositories.Sql.RelyingPartyRepository.Update&amp;#40;RelyingParty relyingParty&amp;#41; in C&amp;#58;&amp;#92;Projects&amp;#92;SingleSignOn&amp;#92;IdentityServer&amp;#92;ADFSRP&amp;#92;Thinktecture.IdentityServer.Core.Repositories&amp;#92;RelyingPartyRepository.cs&amp;#58;line 98&lt;br /&gt;   at Thinktecture.IdentityServer.Web.Controllers.RelyingPartiesAdminController.Edit&amp;#40;RelyingPartyModel relyingParty&amp;#41; in C&amp;#58;&amp;#92;Projects&amp;#92;SingleSignOn&amp;#92;IdentityServer&amp;#92;ADFSRP&amp;#92;WebSite&amp;#92;Controllers&amp;#92;Admin&amp;#92;RelyingPartiesAdminController.cs&amp;#58;line 85&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I was trying to specify one of my .cer files. I also tried with a smaller .cer file and it worked. The larger file was 1.5K and the smaller one was 716 bytes. So I think this just has to do with the size of the .cer file.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: Sarafian ** &lt;p&gt;I have the same issue. I did as clineer suggested and works.&lt;br /&gt;Possible problem is that SQL Server compact restricts column size to 4K. My certificate was like 2.3K. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the app. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>Sarafian</author><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 12:56:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Trying to specify a certificate overflows the string buffer [9256] 20120702125631P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Cannot add relying party as https [8211]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/8211</link><description>After succesfully adding a relying party with a https url the url changes to http.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I saw that the real is saved in the database without a protocol prefix.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I found the problem&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When the real is filled&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Realm &amp;#61; new Uri&amp;#40;&amp;#34;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#34; &amp;#43; rpEntity.Realm&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When the real is saved&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;Realm &amp;#61; relyingParty.Realm.AbsoluteUri.StripProtocolMoniker&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is there are reason to strip the protocol&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: johnxjcheng ** &lt;p&gt;I thought it should accept https as well, but later on realized it&amp;#8217;s not necessary. Thinktecture does not store protocol as a port of the realm in the repository. It trims the protocol off before saving and add it back before displaying. So, I guess this allows the realm work against either http or https. When you do Add STS reference, you may choose to use https. This works fine for me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>johnxjcheng</author><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:21:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Cannot add relying party as https [8211] 20120626062136P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: antiforgery [9438]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/9438</link><description>hi, i got the antiforgery-error when calling global configuration.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: macseinsfeld ** &lt;p&gt;sorry, wrote this via Handy. should be in the discussion-section. please close it...&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>macseinsfeld</author><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 04:53:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: antiforgery [9438] 20120608045358A</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: antiforgery [9438]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/9438</link><description>hi, i got the antiforgery-error when calling global configuration.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>macseinsfeld</author><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 08:43:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: antiforgery [9438] 20120607084354A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Init setup failes when running Non-SQL Compact [9397]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/9397</link><description>After the needed configuration to run on a real SQL the setup will never start with the error&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No signing certificate found in database.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is caused by multiple calles like &amp;#40;also to check if the setup has to run&amp;#41;&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;            if &amp;#40;&amp;#33;string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace&amp;#40;ConfigurationRepository.SigningCertificate.SubjectDistinguishedName&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But this call always throws a&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;  if &amp;#40;cert &amp;#61;&amp;#61; null&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;                        &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;                            throw new ConfigurationErrorsException&amp;#40;&amp;#34;No signing certificate found in database&amp;#34;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                        &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: jakenk ** &lt;p&gt;If this is the same problem I had, I had to insert default certificates into the Certificates table.  The rest of the config options were fine empty &amp;#38; defaulted cleanly, but these had to be inserted manually.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;INSERT INTO dbo.Certificates&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#40; Name, SubjectDistinguishedName &amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;VALUES  &amp;#40; N&amp;#39;SSL&amp;#39;, -- Name - nvarchar&amp;#40;100&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;          N&amp;#39;CN&amp;#61;localhost&amp;#39;  -- SubjectDistinguishedName - nvarchar&amp;#40;200&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;          &amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;INSERT INTO dbo.Certificates&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#40; Name, SubjectDistinguishedName &amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;VALUES  &amp;#40; N&amp;#39;SigningCertificate&amp;#39;, -- Name - nvarchar&amp;#40;100&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;          N&amp;#39;CN&amp;#61;localhost&amp;#39;  -- SubjectDistinguishedName - nvarchar&amp;#40;200&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;          &amp;#41;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>jakenk</author><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:28:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Init setup failes when running Non-SQL Compact [9397] 20120517032818P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Init setup failes when running Non-SQL Compact [9397]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/9397</link><description>After the needed configuration to run on a real SQL the setup will never start with the error&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No signing certificate found in database.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is caused by multiple calles like &amp;#40;also to check if the setup has to run&amp;#41;&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;            if &amp;#40;&amp;#33;string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace&amp;#40;ConfigurationRepository.SigningCertificate.SubjectDistinguishedName&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But this call always throws a&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;  if &amp;#40;cert &amp;#61;&amp;#61; null&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;                        &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;                            throw new ConfigurationErrorsException&amp;#40;&amp;#34;No signing certificate found in database&amp;#34;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                        &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>jmvermeulen</author><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 09:09:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Init setup failes when running Non-SQL Compact [9397] 20120514090931A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: https://localhost/sts/issue/wstrust/mex doesn't return anything... [8855]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/8855</link><description>Hi &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Does someone know why mex endpoint doesn&amp;#39;t return anything, &amp;#63; I downloaded latest version as well but it doesn&amp;#39;t return any information,&lt;br /&gt;it returns HTTP&amp;#47;1.1 400 Bad Request, &lt;br /&gt;I tried ACS mex endpoint&lt;br /&gt;https&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;xxxxx.accesscontrol.appfabriclabs.com&amp;#47;v2&amp;#47;wstrust&amp;#47;mex&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;and it does return WSDL, also &lt;br /&gt;https&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;localhost&amp;#47;sts&amp;#47;issue&amp;#47;wstrust&amp;#63;wsdl return WSDL &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;why mex endpoint returns Bad request&amp;#63; is it a bug or do I have to any configuration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have been using STS for a while and for .NET clients this wasn&amp;#39;t be a problem. But recently I tried connecting WCF protected with STS and i&amp;#39;m getting following error, so then i just checked the mex endpoint and it returns Bad Request, can someone help me on this.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Oct 26, 2011 3&amp;#58;54&amp;#58;40 PM com.sun.xml.wss.jaxws.impl.SecurityClientTube invokeTrustPlugin&lt;br /&gt;SEVERE&amp;#58; WSSTUBE0035&amp;#58; Recieved Exception during IssuedToken Creation.&lt;br /&gt;com.sun.xml.ws.api.security.trust.WSTrustException&amp;#58; WST0017&amp;#58;Could not obtain STS metadata. MEX call to STS https&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;mydomain.com&amp;#47;issue&amp;#47;wstrust&amp;#47;mex failed.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;at com.sun.xml.ws.security.trust.impl.TrustPluginImpl.doMexRequest&amp;#40;TrustPluginImpl.java&amp;#58;682&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;at com.sun.xml.ws.security.trust.impl.TrustPluginImpl.invokeRST&amp;#40;TrustPluginImpl.java&amp;#58;5&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: ramesh1312 ** &lt;p&gt;sfsfsafsaf&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>ramesh1312</author><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:51:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: https://localhost/sts/issue/wstrust/mex doesn't return anything... [8855] 20120322015127P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Trying to specify a certificate overflows the string buffer [9256]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/9256</link><description>I have IdentityServer setup and was specifying a new relying party in the admin pages but after choosing a certificate and clicking submit I get an error on screen&amp;#58; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#8226;An error occurred while updating the entries. See the inner exception for details.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So then I attach to process and attempt to track down the error and the text version of my certificate &amp;#40;beginning with MII&amp;#42;&amp;#41; is 2120 characters when it is expecting 2048. Here is the messge and stack trace&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An error occurred while updating the entries. See the inner exception for details.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   at System.Data.Entity.Internal.InternalContext.SaveChanges&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;   at Thinktecture.IdentityServer.Repositories.Sql.RelyingPartyRepository.Update&amp;#40;RelyingParty relyingParty&amp;#41; in C&amp;#58;&amp;#92;Projects&amp;#92;SingleSignOn&amp;#92;IdentityServer&amp;#92;ADFSRP&amp;#92;Thinktecture.IdentityServer.Core.Repositories&amp;#92;RelyingPartyRepository.cs&amp;#58;line 98&lt;br /&gt;   at Thinktecture.IdentityServer.Web.Controllers.RelyingPartiesAdminController.Edit&amp;#40;RelyingPartyModel relyingParty&amp;#41; in C&amp;#58;&amp;#92;Projects&amp;#92;SingleSignOn&amp;#92;IdentityServer&amp;#92;ADFSRP&amp;#92;WebSite&amp;#92;Controllers&amp;#92;Admin&amp;#92;RelyingPartiesAdminController.cs&amp;#58;line 85&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I was trying to specify one of my .cer files. I also tried with a smaller .cer file and it worked. The larger file was 1.5K and the smaller one was 716 bytes. So I think this just has to do with the size of the .cer file.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: DominickBaier ** &lt;p&gt;OK. Thanks&amp;#33; Will add that to the &amp;#34;to fix&amp;#34; list for v.next.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>DominickBaier</author><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:40:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Trying to specify a certificate overflows the string buffer [9256] 20120320084017A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Trying to specify a certificate overflows the string buffer [9256]</title><link>http://identityserver.codeplex.com/workitem/9256</link><description>I have IdentityServer setup and was specifying a new relying party in the admin pages but after choosing a certificate and clicking submit I get an error on screen&amp;#58; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#8226;An error occurred while updating the entries. See the inner exception for details.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So then I attach to process and attempt to track down the error and the text version of my certificate &amp;#40;beginning with MII&amp;#42;&amp;#41; is 2120 characters when it is expecting 2048. Here is the messge and stack trace&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An error occurred while updating the entries. See the inner exception for details.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   at System.Data.Entity.Internal.InternalContext.SaveChanges&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;   at Thinktecture.IdentityServer.Repositories.Sql.RelyingPartyRepository.Update&amp;#40;RelyingParty relyingParty&amp;#41; in C&amp;#58;&amp;#92;Projects&amp;#92;SingleSignOn&amp;#92;IdentityServer&amp;#92;ADFSRP&amp;#92;Thinktecture.IdentityServer.Core.Repositories&amp;#92;RelyingPartyRepository.cs&amp;#58;line 98&lt;br /&gt;   at Thinktecture.IdentityServer.Web.Controllers.RelyingPartiesAdminController.Edit&amp;#40;RelyingPartyModel relyingParty&amp;#41; in C&amp;#58;&amp;#92;Projects&amp;#92;SingleSignOn&amp;#92;IdentityServer&amp;#92;ADFSRP&amp;#92;WebSite&amp;#92;Controllers&amp;#92;Admin&amp;#92;RelyingPartiesAdminController.cs&amp;#58;line 85&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I was trying to specify one of my .cer files. I also tried with a smaller .cer file and it worked. The larger file was 1.5K and the smaller one was 716 bytes. So I think this just has to do with the size of the .cer file.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: clineer ** &lt;p&gt;I was able to solve this issue by opening the SQL CE database up in WebMatrix and then making the RelyingParties.EncryptionCertificate column length to 3000. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks&amp;#33;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>clineer</author><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 19:44:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Trying to specify a certificate overflows the string buffer [9256] 20120319074417P</guid></item></channel></rss>